Keynote presentations
Phil Roni, Kramer Fisheries
Janine Castro, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Dave Rosgen, Wildland Hydrology
Bob Barr, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
Panel Discussion
Presentation PDf's
Stream and Watershed Restoration: Guidance for Restoring Riverine Processes and Fish Habitat. KEYNOTE -Phil Roni, Cramer Fisheries, Presentation
Restoring Ecosystem Processes and Resilience in River Systems. Luther Aadland, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Presentation
Trick or Treat: Does Natural Channel Design Work to Improve Stream Ecological Function? Matt Kondratieff, Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Presentation
Stream Restoration: Does Restoring Structure Lead to Function? Sara McMillan, Purdue University, Presentation
Streams without Biology: How Physics Inadvertently Usurped River Restoration. KEYNOTE – Janine Castro, USFWS, Presentation
Land Use Change Impact on Channels. Sandy Verry, Ellen River Partners, Presentation
River Channel Responses to Large Increases in Flows and Sediment Supply. Patrick Belmont, Utah State University, Presentation
Has Stormwater Management Been Our Achilles Heel in River Management? Bill Annable, University of Waterloo, Presentation
Restoring Ecological and Geomorphic Function on the Heartrock Ranch, Idaho. KEYNOTE - Dave Rosgen, Wildland Hydrology, Presentation
The Yellow River Initiative - An Introduction to the Kankakee River Problem and Plan. KEYNOTE - Bob Barr, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Presentation
Regional Sediment Data and Regional Curves: Increasing Confidence in Designs Through Competence, Capacity and Support. Alan Walker, StreamWalker Consulting LLC, Presentation
Stream Channel Succession and Sediment Dynamics: Black Vermillion River, KS. Tim Keane, Kansas State University, Presentation
Sediment Sources, Baseline Sediment – Transport Rates and the Effectiveness of Restoration Measures for Reducing Loads to Receiving Waters. Andrew Simon, Cardno, Presentation
Applied Research Efforts to Improve the Design, Implementation and Management of Ecological Restoration in North Carolina. Barbara Doll, North Carolina State University. Presentation
Adaptive Management: Using Geomorphic Stream Stage and Transition and Departure Conditions to Plan and Generate Restoration. Barry Southerland, USDA, NRCS. Presentation
The Growing & Evolving Benefits of Stream Restoration – From Resiliency to Stormwater BMP – How Will the
Industry Continue to Adapt? George Athanasakes, Stantec. Presentation
Posters
1. Bomier, M. and Bomier, W. Rethinking the Red Clay Project: Restoration in the Nemadji. View
2. Childers, A. Biodiversity as an indicator of success. View
3. Curie, E. and Gran, K. Monitoring bluff erosion rates using terrestrial laser scanning and Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry on Minnesota’s North Shore streams. View
4. Erickson, T. Applied Methods for Targeting Fluvial Restoration Efforts.
5. Groten, J.; Ellison, C.; Koller, K. Application of Dimensionless Sediment Rating Curves in Minnesota.
6. Hollenhorst, T. and Moffett, M. Developing a High Resolution Eco-Hydrologic Watershed Model for Three Local Streams
7. Jicha, T.; Hill, B.; Woodruff, D. A Nutrient’s downstream spiral. View
8. McCarthy, J.; Harman, W.; Jones, C. Stream Mitigation - Developing Reference Curves to Inform Calculations of Lift and Loss
9. Nerbonne, B. Minnesota’s Culvert Assessment App and Database. View
10. Kogge, S.; Dierks, S.; Majka, B.; Bowen, T.; Prentice, S. Three Mile Creek Dam Failure and Site Restoration.
11. Majka, B.; Kogge, S.; Dierks, S.; Bowen, T.; Prentice, S. Brent Run Creek Relocation and Wetland Creation. View
12. Rantala, H.; Nicklay, B.; Harris, M.; Koller, K. Using stream temperature data to assess restoration in the Stewart
River, MN. View
13. Wick, M.; Wheeler, M.; Hollenhorst, T.; Fischbach, J.; Martin, N.; Bernthal, T.; Fitzpatrick, F. Slowing the flow: Setting priorities and defining success in Lake Superior’s south shore watersheds. View
2. Childers, A. Biodiversity as an indicator of success. View
3. Curie, E. and Gran, K. Monitoring bluff erosion rates using terrestrial laser scanning and Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry on Minnesota’s North Shore streams. View
4. Erickson, T. Applied Methods for Targeting Fluvial Restoration Efforts.
5. Groten, J.; Ellison, C.; Koller, K. Application of Dimensionless Sediment Rating Curves in Minnesota.
6. Hollenhorst, T. and Moffett, M. Developing a High Resolution Eco-Hydrologic Watershed Model for Three Local Streams
7. Jicha, T.; Hill, B.; Woodruff, D. A Nutrient’s downstream spiral. View
8. McCarthy, J.; Harman, W.; Jones, C. Stream Mitigation - Developing Reference Curves to Inform Calculations of Lift and Loss
9. Nerbonne, B. Minnesota’s Culvert Assessment App and Database. View
10. Kogge, S.; Dierks, S.; Majka, B.; Bowen, T.; Prentice, S. Three Mile Creek Dam Failure and Site Restoration.
11. Majka, B.; Kogge, S.; Dierks, S.; Bowen, T.; Prentice, S. Brent Run Creek Relocation and Wetland Creation. View
12. Rantala, H.; Nicklay, B.; Harris, M.; Koller, K. Using stream temperature data to assess restoration in the Stewart
River, MN. View
13. Wick, M.; Wheeler, M.; Hollenhorst, T.; Fischbach, J.; Martin, N.; Bernthal, T.; Fitzpatrick, F. Slowing the flow: Setting priorities and defining success in Lake Superior’s south shore watersheds. View
This Conference is held by Laurentian RC&D; and is funded in part by Federal award NA17NOS4190062 under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, administered by the Office for Coastal Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Department of Commerce granted to Laurentian RC&D by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Program.
Copyright 2018. All rights reserved. Website photo's supplied by MNDNR unless otherwise noted.
Copyright 2018. All rights reserved. Website photo's supplied by MNDNR unless otherwise noted.